Commercial banks’ efforts to boost revenue by selling corporate finance and capital markets products to the middle market have not met expectations, with notable exceptions. Despite significant investments in investment banking capabilities, product training, and corporate finance training, this has kept corporate finance teachers busy for several decades. Why is this? What can sales team leaders and market managers do?
Two Key Factors Reduced the Growth Rates for Capital Markets Capabilities. While the reasons for under-performance vary from bank to bank, there are two universal themes. First, there are marketing strategies. The “service” organization (i.e., the capital markets group) and the field sales force did not mesh. The groups had different objectives and different compensation plans. Many salespeople considered the investment bankers arrogant and transactional. The investment bankers considered the relationship managers dim-witted and antiquated. As a result, the two groups could not collaborate to define effective marketing strategies and exchange the information each group needed to take advantage of opportunities.
The second is the sales process. Bank sales managers said, “RMS is already talking to these companies. They can cross-sell or refer opportunities for capital markets.” The sales managers did not see that customers didn’t buy capital markets services like they bought more traditional bank products. Loans and bank products have been sold through a “features/benefits/price” conversation. Capital markets products and services must be sold as “professional services,” where ideas and professional competence are the primary value.
What will it take to close the gap? While much progress has been made, the most critical elements are:
1. better definition of market strategy and sales processes,
2. a new approach to training,
3. more focused sales management, and
4. a recognition and compensation philosophy that, at the minimum, does not distract salespeople from the task.
Better Definition of Market Strategy and Sales Processes
Market strategy is critical, particularly target selection for each capital market’s capability. Specialists and relationship managers must share a common understanding of “what a qualified prospect looks like” for each capital market product or service. These definitions should be specific: “Manufacturing companies with sales > $50 million who meet criteria for Bbb debt ratings and that are interest-rate sensitive.” RMS must know these criteria for each opportunity they’re expected to find.
These criteria enable RMS to plan its sales efforts and effectively forecast prospective business. They also reduce the amount of “noise in the system” from opportunities that don’t deserve attention from scarce investment banker resources. Crisp sales process definitions will help boost the number of prospects identified and reduce the effort expended in a sales process. The field sales organizations and product specialists must define (for each product or service):
The steps of the sales process (from initial conversations through origination to the end of execution) have respective roles.
Hand-off points (as from RM to specialist and back again).
Information requirements for each service (what information RM or specialist passes to the other).
Service standards for response times to inquiries, lead times for presentations, and other sales support activities.
These definitions provide a framework for RMs and specialists to work together effectively, each knowing what they can expect from the other and when.
New Approach to Training and Sharing Information
To meet client expectations, bank training must prepare RMS for their roles in the sales processes (which differ by product or capability). Product training and sales training should be modified depending on the RMS’s roles in opportunity identification and selling. This is not a new problem. For example, in 1998, Merrill Lynch made initial attempts to generate additional mergers and acquisition advisory business.
Fortune magazine reported: “[Clients] wanted bankers who came to them steeped in knowledge of their industry and full of creative ideas. That was a problem for Merrill’s M&A bankers, who were generalists. Many bankers didn’t know enough about each industry to make provocative presentations.” (Fortune Magazine, April 27, 1998, page 138) Data from Greenwich Associates and other firms confirm that clients today expect the same from investment and commercial bankers who want to deliver more strategic capital markets and corporate finance services.
Like Merrill, bank leaders now must make specific decisions about how they are organized and how their bankers are prepared to respond to these clients’ expectations of advisors. The same logic applies to small business, middle-market, and large corporate banking. Whether you’re offering M&A advice, Treasury Services, mutual funds, or debt financing, product training should be transformed into “customer training” to focus on:
The owner, CEO, or CFO issues and concerns. The problems that the bank’s capabilities solve. Questions that will help the RMS assess a customer’s goals and circumstances and draw conclusions about which investment bank capabilities are appropriate and what potential benefit will be created.
Answers to customer questions, including:
What does this do (explained in terms normal people can understand)?
When does this approach benefit a company like ours?
What are the alternatives?
Who have you done this for?
What will it cost, and how long will it take?
Sales training should shift toward a professional services model in which the value comes from the expertise of team members, of which the RM is one. Clients want counsel from people who have been down particular roads before. They are looking for advisors who can take a view or a position about market conditions and other factors. Sales training should prepare RMS to probe these issues deeply and to offer opinions. RMS must be a good representative of the expertise that will later come from the capital markets professionals.
This begins with intimate customer knowledge. Generally speaking, RMs know their customers well at a transactional level – specific needs the customer has decided to address. Typically, they do not know their customers well enough to identify opportunities or capital market services. Key missing ingredients include:
Customer goals, strategies, policies, and market positioning (which provide the context for proactive opportunity identification). Ideas and techniques in “entering discussions” have not moved to the “take action” stage.
Variables (such as commodity prices) that bring risk into the customer’s business. The sales training must also teach the RMS to position the capital markets group’s capabilities and begin prescribing sales processes. Often, this will include the ability to describe “success stories” that demonstrate capabilities and market savvy.
Finally, make sure your RMs receive and read the information they will need to discuss in sales calls and conversations over meals: Capital markets activity (rates, players, deal structures, etc.) and current trends/opportunities.
Up-to-date information about internal processes, players, and methods.
More Focused Sales Management.
Sales managers (from line-of-business head to sales team leader) must decide how their teams will “play the game.” Since all product suppliers in the bank compete for Salesforce mind-share, the sales managers must set a strategy and priorities for Salesforce’s attention. With the basic direction and expectations set, there are several important goals for sales managers:
First Priority: Field Coaching
Get into the field to observe calls and to coach even though you don’t have time. Sales management coaching disciplines drive sales results. If you want to identify more opportunities for capital markets and corporate finance, you must increase the amount of time and attention you pay to them through your questions and time in the field. This is particularly true if you want RMS to do more than spot opportunities and toss them over the fence. If you want them to question deeply to reach the pain and the payoffs that will sell capital markets and corporate finance, you have to be there with them and model it.
Help the RMS learn to anticipate customer issues and present ideas by asking questions about customers’ plans and strategies and prompting them to anticipate needs and generate ideas. The main rule here is: You get what you ask for. If you ask about iopinionsand customer plans, you’ll get more of them. If you ask about loan renewals and administrative matters, that’s what you’ll get.
Use information about products, internal processes, and success stories to drill and coach the RMS. To be confident speaking to business owners or senior officers, they must master the language and the stories. Use sales meetings, time in the car or on the plane, or phone to ask questions like: “How do you describe our private placement capabilities?”
Second Priority: Planning and Review
Create good sales process descriptions and measures to determine where RMs are working in the sales process accurately. You should be able to say to an RM: “To be successful in your territory with capital markets, you need to identify 50 opportunities, make 30 idea presentations, submit 20 proposals, and close 15 deals with an average fee of $X”. This knowledge comes from tracking and studying RM activities so you know, for your market, what the guidelines are.
Help the RMS prioritize their accounts – which accounts should get the “financial advisor” treatment, which matches the profiles of companies that would benefit from particular capital markets and corporate finance services. Insist on planning – a 1-year territory business plan and account plans for the top 5 – 10 customers and 5 – 10 prospects. The planning will (1) help focus the RM’s time on accounts most likely to be productive and (2) help the RM think through the customer’s goals, strategies, policies, and obstacles.
Review progress toward targets through:
Monthly business review meetings with RMs to review their short-term action items and forecasted business. Quarterly account reviews to revisit their one-year business plans and all account plans – where are we versus what we’d planned, why, and what do we need to do to close the gap?
A Supportive Recognition and Compensation Plan
The basic test we apply is: “Not harm.” Relationship manager recognition and compensation plans are typically complex because of the large array of products and services available for sale and the impact on a bank’s balance sheet and income statement—separate recognition and incentive compensation plans. The recognition plan should kick in for activities that drive sales. The compensation plan should kick in for sales results. Our “no harm” guidelines include:
Create a system of immediate and visible recognition to be awarded based on high-quality completion of activities – capital markets or corporate finance opportunities identified, proposals submitted, and so on. You want to stimulate and recognize the actions leading to the results. Use personal notes, peer recognition in team meetings, circulation of good proposals to team members, and other techniques that call attention to what was done and how it was done.
Establish incentive compensation plans that reward RMS for generating capital markets or corporate finance revenue.
To shift RM’s attention toward certain capabilities, make some revenue count for more in the plan than other types of revenue. (Example: private placement fees might count for $1.25 per dollar cost while loan commitment fees might count for 80 cents per payment. DO NOT run sales contests based on product sales (numbers of installations or revenue by-product). The dynamics of these approaches completely counter the “advisory” policy needed to position and sell capital markets and corporate finance services (and other bank products). Establish incentives for retaining accounts. This compensates the RM for the time and risk associated with working arrangements worth keeping but not big revenue generators in a given year.
Compensation and recognition plans must recognize that RMs must invest time to develop their knowledge, competence, and confidence in their customers’ circumstances and the services they represent. The projects must remember the time RMS sponsors with their customers, learning far more about them than they had to learn when selling ZBA accounts, loans, or corporate trust services. The plans must recognize the risk the RMs take when selling these services; the chances of their compensation and sales production are higher for capital markets and corporate finance capabilities than for standard loans and operations-oriented products.
Summary
Sales management coaching drives sales results. To accelerate sales of capital markets and corporate finance products and services toward optimum levels: Clarify market strategies and sales processes by product, including the specific roles and hand-off points for RMS and specialists. Increase emphasis on “customer and industry” training. Ensure RMs see a constant flow of market information (about deals, rates, and market activity) that they need when they talk to customers. Focus sales management attention and recognition on the aactionsthat lead to the results you want (high sales of corporate finance and capital markets products). Field coaching and planning are the two highest priorities.