Hong Kong, January 09, 2018 — Moody’s Investors Service has assigned a B2 rating to the USD senior unsecured notes proposed by Times Property Holdings Limited (B1 wonderful). Times Property plans to apply the proposed notice proceeds specifically to refinance current indebtedness.

Rating RATIONALE

“The proposed notice issuance will now not have a material impact on Times Property’s credit score metrics because the proceeds may be used for refinancing,” says Danny Chan, a Moody’s Analyst and Lead Analyst for Times Property. In addition, the proposed issuance will lengthen the organization’s debt adulthood profile and reduce its average financing cost because it will use the proceeds to refinance its present better-value borrowings.

The tremendous outlook on Times Property’s CFR displays Moody’s expectation that the organization will enhance its debt leverage, supported by a sturdy sales boom and a solid gross income margin over the next 12-18 months. Moody expects the company’s debt leverage, measured by revenue/adjusted debt, will gradually improve through a robust sales increase to around seventy-five percent within the subsequent 12-18 months. This is based totally upon the corporation’s strong 42% contracted sales growth 12 months-on-year in 2017 to RMB41.6 billion, to be able to, in flip, help sales increase over the next 1-2 years.

Property

The agency also maintained its pronounced gross income margin at 26. Four in 1H 2017, largely unchanged from 2016, and a stage that has to support homebuilding EBIT/interest above 3x inside the next 1-2 years. Times Property’s liquidity position is strong. Its coins balance of RMB13.1 billion at the end of June 2017 properly blanketed its debt of RMB2.4 billion, maturing over the following three hundred and sixty-five days. Times Property’s B1 company’s family rating (CFR) displays its growing working scale, mounted brand, and track file in Guangdong Province.

The employer’s score additionally considers its stable earnings margins and sturdy liquidity profile. However, Times Property’s B1 CFR is tempered with its (1) geographic awareness in Guangdong Province and (2) exposure to the financing and execution dangers associated with its speedy growth commercial enterprise method. The senior unsecured score on the proposed notes is one notch lower than the organization’s CFR because of structural and felony subordination risk.

This threat displays Moody’s expectation that the general public of claims might be at the level of the working subsidiaries. It could have precedence over claims at the maintaining organization in a bankruptcy situation. In addition, the keeping enterprise lacks tremendous mitigating elements for structural subordination, lowering the expected recovery rate for claims on the keeping organization.

Upward score stress ought to emerge if (1) Times Property indicates a record of strong growth in income and running scale and maintains its strong cash role with cash/short-term debt of 2x; and (2) the organization’s sales/adjusted debt exceeds seventy five%-eighty% and altered EBIT/hobby exceeds 3x on a sustained basis. On the opposite hand, the rating outlook should return to solid if Times Property suggests (1) volatility in its gotten smaller sales and sales, (2) better-than-anticipated land acquisitions, or (3) a discounted probability of its credit metrics achieving degrees suitable for a scoring upgrade over the medium term.

The main technique utilized in these rankings was Homebuilding And Property Development Industry, posted in April 2015. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.Moodys.Com for a replica of this technique. Times Property Holdings Limited is an belongings developer based in Guangdong Province, centered on assembly end-person demand for mass-market housing. At the give-up of June 2017, it had sixty-two assets projects across eight towns in Guangdong Province and Changsha metropolis in Hunan Province. It is a land financial institution totaling around 14.5 million rectangular meters as of the same date.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For rankings issued on a software, series, or class/elegance of debt, this statement gives sure regulatory disclosures about each rating of an eventually issued bond or note of the identical collection or type/elegance of debt or under software for which the rankings are derived exclusively from present orders according to Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support issuer, this assertion presents positive regulatory disclosures about the credit rating movement at the guide issuer and on the subject of each specific credit rating motion for securities that derive their credit scores from the support provider’s credit score rating.

For provisional ratings, this assertion offers certain regulatory disclosures on the subject of the temporary score assigned, and when it comes to a definitive score that can be given after the final issuance of the debt, in each case in which the transaction structure and terms have no longer modified before the challenge of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For additional facts, please see the scores tab on the issuer/entity web page for the respective provider on www.Moodys.Com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit guidance from the primary entity(is) of this credit rating movement and whose scores may additionally alternate due to this credit score rating motion, the associated regulatory disclosures could be the ones of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this technique exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, and exposure from rated entity.

Read More Articles :

Regulatory disclosures in this press launch observe the credit rating and, if relevant, the related score outlook or rating evaluation. Please see www.Moodys.Com for any updates on adjustments to the lead rating analyst and Moody’s felony entity that has issued the rating. Please see the rating tab on the issuer/entity web page on www.Moodys.Com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit score. The first call below is the lead score analyst for this Credit Rating, and the last name below is the individual often answerable for approving this Credit Rating.